bug: Eliminate dead round-robin insertion in enforce distribution #19132
+0
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…equire hash repartitioning branch
gene-bordegaray
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
Eliminates dead code that was not used in the enforce distribution rule.
In the branch where a parent requires hash repartitioning, there was a condition that would "add" a round robin if hash was not necessary (already hashed correctly) and the add round-robin flag was marked as true. This condition would never evaluate to true because anytime a parent requires hash repartitioning, we cannot round-robin because it would break the hash partitioning.
What changes are included in this PR?
A condition is deleted. No tests or plans were changed since this was dead code.
Are these changes tested?
Yes, all tests (unit and sqllogictests) still pass.
There is no new tests to add.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.